Who it’s for / Brokers and prop firms

We cannot be the other side of your book.

We hold no trading permissions and never quote, so the separation is structural rather than a policy. Where a licensed maker quotes into your book you are told which category, which week, and which layer filled each trade.

Weekly counterparty disclosure

Illustrative extract, one week
Category
Aggregated
Made
Subsidised
{{ d.cat }}
{{ d.agg }}
{{ d.made }}
{{ d.sub }}

Share of matched volume by liquidity layer, per category, per week. Delivered as a report and as a per-trade extract you can load into your own reconciliation.

Conflict, stated plainly

You have spent years managing B-book optics. We are not going to pretend the question away.

{{ c.k }}

{{ c.t }}

{{ c.d }}
Why it fits a brokerage

A bounded-risk instrument for the clients your CFD book keeps losing.

Retail CFD attrition is driven by margin closeouts. An instrument where the maximum loss is the stake, stated on the ticket before the order, changes the shape of that curve. It also gives your marketing something to say that is not leverage.

How reactivation runs ›

{{ f.t }}

{{ f.k }}

{{ f.d }}
Prop firms specifically

Evaluation accounts and event contracts need one decision made up front.

Whether event contracts count toward an evaluation objective is a rules question, not a technical one. The engine supports either configuration; what matters is that you decide before the first challenge account trades one.

{{ p.k }}

{{ p.t }}

{{ p.d }}
Other segments

Same venue, different operators.
Who it’s for / Brokers and prop firms

We cannot be the other side of your book.

We hold no trading permissions and never quote, so the separation is structural rather than a policy. Where a licensed maker quotes into your book you are told which category, which week, and which layer filled each trade.

Weekly counterparty disclosure

Illustrative extract, one week
Category
Aggregated
Made
Subsidised
Politics
18%
71%
11%
Macro
46%
52%
2%
Sport
61%
37%
2%
Crypto
38%
58%
4%
Long tail
0%
24%
76%

Share of matched volume by liquidity layer, per category, per week. Delivered as a report and as a per-trade extract you can load into your own reconciliation.

Conflict, stated plainly

You have spent years managing B-book optics. We are not going to pretend the question away.

What is true

A licensed maker quotes into your book

On the categories in your coverage schedule, the contracted maker is often the largest resting size. Pretending otherwise would not survive your first reconciliation.

What is true

You can audit every fill

Per-trade execution data names the liquidity layer on each fill, with timestamps and sequence numbers, so your team can reproduce the weekly report independently.

What is not

We do not see your client flow

Neither we nor the maker receives your trader identities, balances or pre-trade order flow. That separation is contractual and technical.

What is not

We do not widen against you

The maximum spread is a contractual ceiling with a remedy. If quoting gets uneconomic the maker can stop within the named exclusions, but nobody widens past the target quietly.

Why it fits a brokerage

A bounded-risk instrument for the clients your CFD book keeps losing.

Retail CFD attrition is driven by margin closeouts. An instrument where the maximum loss is the stake, stated on the ticket before the order, changes the shape of that curve. It also gives your marketing something to say that is not leverage.

How reactivation runs ›

Bounded loss on the ticket

Fit 01

Maximum loss is the stake and it is shown before the order. No margin call, no closeout, no negative balance conversation with support.

Your existing MT or proprietary front end

Fit 02

Widgets or the mobile SDK sit inside what you already ship. The event-contract book is separate from your CFD pricing entirely.

One ledger, one statement

Fit 03

Balances and statements reconcile to your ledger of record daily, so client money handling does not fork.

IB and affiliate machinery

Fit 04

Your partner network can be paid on event-contract revenue with the same tiering and anti-fraud checks you already run.

Prop firms specifically

Evaluation accounts and event contracts need one decision made up front.

Whether event contracts count toward an evaluation objective is a rules question, not a technical one. The engine supports either configuration; what matters is that you decide before the first challenge account trades one.

Option A

Excluded from objectives

Event contracts trade on a separate live account only. Cleanest rules position, and the one most firms start with.

Option B

Included with a cap

Counts toward objectives up to a stated share of the account, which stops evaluation being gamed by a single binary bet.

Option C

Fully included

Treated like any other instrument. Requires your risk team to model binary payoffs against your drawdown rules first.

Sandbox credentials are available before contract.

Book the walkthrough and a solutions engineer takes your integration lead through the engine, the resolution policy and the commitment terms. One business day to reply.